(Non-)Modern Political Party Campaigns in Lithuania: A Case Study of the 2024 Parliamentary Election
Articles
Simona Kvederytė-Vaitkevičienė
Vilnius University image/svg+xml
Andrius Šuminas
Vilnius University image/svg+xml
Published 2026-09-14
https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2026.103.4
PDF
HTML

Keywords

modern election campaigns
data and research-driven campaigns
voter segmentation
artificial intelligence
2024 parliamentary elections

How to Cite

Kvederytė-Vaitkevičienė, S., & Šuminas, A. (2026). (Non-)Modern Political Party Campaigns in Lithuania: A Case Study of the 2024 Parliamentary Election. Information & Media, 103, 91-113. https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2026.103.4

Abstract

This article analyzes the campaigns of Lithuanian political parties in the 2024 parliamentary election through the lens of modern political campaigning. Based on interviews with campaign managers from seven parties that each received more than 4 percent of the vote, the study examines campaign planning, communication strategies, expert involvement, data use, voter segmentation, targeted communication, and artificial intelligence. The findings show that Lithuanian campaigns display some features of modern campaigning, but their implementation remains limited. Campaign planning is not always systematic, while data, technology and artificial intelligence are only partially integrated into strategic decision-making. A comparison of the year 2016 and 2024 parliamentary election campaigns also reveals signs of campaign development along with elements of continuity, stagnation, or regression.

PDF
HTML

Author contributions (CRediT)

  • Simona Kvederytė-Vaitkevičienė: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing
  • Andrius Šuminas: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – Review & Editing, Writing – Original Draft Preparation

References

Aagaard, P. (2016). The fourth age of political communication: democratic decay or the rise of phronetic political communication. Nordicum-Mediterraneum, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.33112/nm.11.3.8

2. Anstead, N. (2017). Data-driven campaigning in the 2015 United Kingdom general election. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 22(3), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217706163

3. Auter, Z. J., & Fine, J. A. (2018). Social media campaigning: mobilization and fundraising on facebook. Social Science Quarterly, 99(1), 185–200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26613110

4. Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2019). Data campaigning: between empirics and assumptions. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1437

5. Baldwin-Philippi, J. (2017). The myths of data-driven campaigning. Political Communication, 34(4), 627–633.

6. Baum, C. L., & Owens, M. F. (2023). Does personal door-to-door campaigning influence voters? Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 105, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102043

7. Bennett, C. J., & Lyon, D. (2019). Data-driven elections: implications and challenges for democratic societies. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1433

8. Bhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., & Hansen, K. M. (2019). Is door-to-door canvassing effective in Europe? Evidence from a meta-study across six european countries. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000521

9. Blumer, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third Age of political communication: influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596

10. Brkan, M. (2020). EU fundamental rights and democracy implications of data-driven political campaigns. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 27(6), 774–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20982960

11. Chu, X., Noetzel, S., Stubenvoll, M., Otto, L., Lecheler, S., Matthes, J., Vliegenthart, R., & Kruikemeier, S. (2026). Effects of data-driven campaigning: An integrative framework, literature review, and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/anncom/wlag004

12. Cohen, M. D. (2021). Modern political campaigns: how professionalism, technology, and speed have revolutionized elections. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. https://books.google.lt/books?id=7mUuEAAAQBAJ

13. Davis, A. (2026). The growth of hybrid political actors in the fourth age of political communication. Global Media and Communication, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665251406808

14. Dommett, K. (2023, December 4). All change in digital election campaigning? UK in a changing Europe. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/all-change-in-digital-election-campaigning/

15. Dommett, K., Barclay, A., & Gibson, R. (2024). Just what is data-driven campaigning? A systematic review. Information, Communication & Society, 27(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2166794

16. Dommett, K., Power, S., Barclay, A., & Macintyre, A. (2024). Understanding the modern election campaign: analysing campaign eras through financial transparency disclosures at the 2019 UK general election. Government and Opposition, 60(1), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2024.3

17. Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond. NYU Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qgh5x

18. Gibson, R. (2023). Data-driven campaigning as a disruptive force. Political Communication, 40(3), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2207486

19. Gibson, R. K., & Römmele, A. (2009). Measuring the professionalization of political campaigning. Party Politics, 15(3), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068809102245

20. Goodwin, A., Joseff, K., Riedl, M. J., Lukito, J., & Woolley, S. (2023). Political relational influencers: the mobilization of social media influencers in the political arena. International Journal of Communication, 17, 1613–1633. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18987/4070

21. Grusell, M., & Nord, L. (2016). Setting the Trend or Changing the Game? Professionalization and digitalization of election campaigns in Sweden. Journal of Political Marketing, 19(3), 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2016.1228555

22. Haq, E.-U., Zhu, Y., Hui, P., & Tyson, G. (2024, May 13–17). History in making: political campaigns in the era of artificial intelligence-generated content. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, Singapore, Singapore (pp. 1115–1118). https://doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3652000

23. Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy, 5(4), 87–88.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.141942

24. Joathan, I., & Lilleker, D. G. (2020). Permanent Campaigning: A meta-analysis and framework for measurement. Journal of Political Marketing, 22(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2020.1832015

25. Kar, A. M. (2018). Research methods 2: Interviews. In B. Ghosh, Methodology of research in sociology. https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/socp3/chapter/research-methods-2-interviews/

26. Kefford, G., Dommett, K., Baldwin-Philippi, J., Bannerman, S., Dobber, T., Kruschinski, S., Kruikemeier, S., & Rzepecki, E. (2022). Data-driven campaigning and democratic disruption: Evidence from six advanced democracies. Party Politics, 29(3), 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221084039 (Original work published 2023).

27. Lavigne, M. (2020). Strengthening ties: The influence of microtargeting on partisan attitudes and the vote. Party Politics, 27(5), 965–976. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820918387

28. Lees-Marshment, J. (2019). Marketing scholars and political marketing: The pragmatic and principled reasons for why marketing academics should research the use of marketing in the political arena. Customer Needs and Solutions, 6, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40547-019-0091-0

29. Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J., & Russmann, U. (2017). Campaigning in the fourth age of political communication. A multi-method study on the use of Facebook by German and Austrian parties in the 2013 national election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11), 1698–1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1254269

30. McKelvey, F., & Piebiak, J. (2019). Does the difference compute? Data-driven campaigning in Canada. In M. Lalancette, V. Raynauld, & E. Crandall (Eds.), What’s trending in Canadian politics? Understanding Transformations in Power, Media, and the Public Sphere (pp. 194–215). University of British Columbia Press. https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774861175-014

31. Moir, A. (2023). The Use of TikTok for political campaigning in Canada: the case of Jagmeet Singh. Social Media + Society, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231157604

32. Munroe Belfry, K., & Munroe, H. D. (2018). Constituency campaigning in the age of data. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 135–154. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423917001135

33. Nord, L. (2023). Digital election campaigns: Does professionalization still matter? In S. Salgado & S. Papathanassopoulos (Eds.), Streamlining political communication concepts: Updates, changes, normalcies (pp. 105–121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45335-9_7

34. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

35. Panagopoulos, C. (2013). Campaign duration and election outcomes. Politics and Governance, 1(1), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v1i1.92

36. Papakyriakopoulos, O., Hegelich, S., Shahrezaye, M., & Serrano, J. C. M. (2018). Social media and microtargeting: political data processing and the consequences for Germany. Big Data & Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718811844

37. Prasad, D. B. (2019). Qualitative content analysis: Why is it still a path less taken? Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3392

38. Rafter, K. (2017). Fianna Fail and the professionalisation of political communication in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 32(1), 141–163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2016.1269756

39. Restrepo Echavarria, J. N., Diaz, R. R., & Castromil, R. A. (2018). Proposal of an indicator to measure the professionalization of election campaigns: The case of Colombia. El Profesional de la Informacion, 27(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.mar.07

40. Roemmele, A., & Gibson, R. (2020). Scientific and subversive: The two faces of the fourth era of political campaigning. New Media & Society, 22(4), 595–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893979

41. Shavit, A., & Konradova, M. (2025). Use of analytics in political marketing: data-driven campaigns, theory and examples. In P. Baines, P. Harris, D. Hejlova, & C. Panagopoulos (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Political Marketing (Vol. 0, pp. 280–299). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529674385.n23

42. Sides, J., Vavreck, L., & Warshaw, C. (2022). The effect of television advertising in United States elections. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 702–718. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100112X

43. Stevenson, R. T., & Vavreck, L. (2000). Does campaign length matter? Testing for cross-national effects. British Journal of Political Science, 30(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400000107

44. Strömbäck, J. (2007). Political marketing and professionalized campaigning: a conceptual analysis. Journal of Political Marketing, 6(2–3), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1300/J199v06n02_04

45. Strömbäck, J., & Kiousis, S. (2014). Strategic political communication in election campaigns. In C. Reinemann (Ed.), Political communication (pp. 109–128). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238174.109

46. Šuminas, A., ir Kiliulytė, A. (2020). Politinės komunikacijos profesionalizacija Lietuvoje: 2016 m. Seimo rinkimų kampanijos atvejo analizė. Parlamento studijos, (28), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.51740/ps.vi28.141

47. Tanusondjaja, A., Michelon, A., Hartnett, N., & Stocchi, L. (2023). Reaching Voters on Social Media: Planning Political Advertising on Snapchat. International Journal of Market Research, 65(5), 566–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231175085

48. Tomic, Z., Damjanovic, T., & Tomic, I. (2023). Artificial intelligence in political campaigns. South Eastern European Journal of Communication, 5(2), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.47960/2712-0457.2.5.17

49. Townsley, J. (2018). Is it worth door-knocking? Evidence from a United Kingdom-based Get Out The Vote (GOTV) field experiment on the effect of party leaflets and canvass visits on voter turnout. Political Science Research and Methods, 13(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.39

50. Unikaitė-Jakuntavičienė, I. (2023). Political campaign professionalization in Lithuanian elections. Journal of Political Marketing, 22(3-4), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2023.2221931

51. Vyriausioji rinkimų komisija (VRK). (2024, spalio 22). Politinėms partijoms paskirstyti valstybės biudžeto asignavimai už 2024 m. II pusmetį. https://www.vrk.lt/naujienos/-/content/10180/1/politinems-partijoms-paskirstyti-valstybes-biudzeto-asignavimai-uz-2024-m-ii-pusmeti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)