Santrauka
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Skaitomiausi šio autoriaus(ų) straipsniai
-
Павел Ивинский,
Толстоведение профессора Базылия Бялокоз
,
Literatūra: T 47 Nr. 2 (2005): Russian Literature
-
Денис Макаров,
Stačiatikiškoji žmogaus vaizdavimo tradicija I.S. Šmeliovo prozoje (atsimainymo idėja)
,
Literatūra: T 49 Nr. 2 (2007): Russian Literature
-
Павел Ивинский,
Исследования по социоанализу
,
Literatūra: T 48 Nr. 2 (2006): Russian Literature
-
Literatūra T. 60,
Redakcinė kolegija ir turinys
,
Literatūra: T 60 Nr. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Džiuljeta Maskuliūnienė,
Šiaulių universiteto Literatūros istorijos ir teorijos katedra 2008 metais
,
Literatūra: T 50 Nr. 1 (2008): Lithuanian Literature
-
Maria Mikhailova,
Sofya Kudritskaya,
Трагический и парадоксальный мир Оcкара Уайльда в интерпретации А. Мирэ
,
Literatūra: T 63 Nr. 2 (2021): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Галина Михайлова,
Тексты культуры в исследованиях сибирских авторов
,
Literatūra: T 51 Nr. 2 (2009): Russian Literature
-
Владимир Воронин,
Фантазия и абсурд в “Косиножке” А.Г. Лысова
,
Literatūra: T 49 Nr. 2 (2007): Russian Literature
-
Literatūra,
Atsiminimai ir liudijimai. Viktorija Daujotytė, Marcelijus Martinaitis, Kęstutis Urba, Rita Tūtlytė, Dainora Pociūtė, Solveiga Daugirdaitė, Regimantas Tamošaitis
,
Literatūra: T 51 Nr. 1 (2009): Lithuanian Literature
-
Наталья Непомнящих,
«В смерти Есенина было что-то невозможное?»
,
Literatūra: T 48 Nr. 2 (2006): Russian Literature