Santrauka
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Skaitomiausi šio autoriaus(ų) straipsniai
-
Neringa Klišienė,
Ketvirtojo dešimtmečio estetinės savimonės laukas: Paryžiaus fenomenas
,
Literatūra: T 52 Nr. 1 (2010): Lithuanian Literature
-
Павел Лавринец,
Respectus philologicus 2002–2004 No. No. 1(6)–6(11)
,
Literatūra: T 47 Nr. 2 (2005): Russian Literature
-
Pavel Lavrinec,
Международный Балтийский семинар «Георгий Адамович и ... (к проблеме изучения культуры русской диаспоры)»
,
Literatūra: T 62 Nr. 2 (2020): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Fiodoras Dostojevskis,
„MAŠA GULI ANT STALO“, „SOCIALIZMAS IR KRIKŠČIONYBĖ“
,
Literatūra: T 55 Nr. 2 (2013): Russian Literature
-
Karolina Repečkaitė,
TEOLOGINIO NARATYVO ANTROPOLOGIJA
,
Literatūra: T 55 Nr. 1 (2013): Lithuanian Literature
-
Таисия Лаукконен,
СОБЫТИЕ ДРУГИХ ПРОСТРАНСТВ: О КОНФЕРЕНЦИИ «ВИЛЬНЮС::ГЕТЕРОТОПИИ» (19–21 СЕНТЯБРЯ 2013 г.)
,
Literatūra: T 55 Nr. 2 (2013): Russian Literature
-
Margarita Varlašina,
Antano Maceinos „Didysis inkvizitorius“: hermeneutinis istorinės veikmės aspektas
,
Literatūra: T 50 Nr. 2 (2008): Russian Literature
-
Павел Ивинский,
Триптих о переходе
,
Literatūra: T 53 Nr. 2 (2011): Russian Literature
-
Parengė Neringa Neringa Klišienė,
2015 metų lietuvių literatūros katedros kronika
,
Literatūra: T 57 Nr. 1 (2015): Lithuanian Literature
-
Dainius Būrė,
Petrarca ir Ariosto: nuo Lauros iki Andželikos arba metaforos nuvainikavimas
,
Literatūra: T 48 Nr. 4 (2006): World Literatures