Santrauka
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Skaitomiausi šio autoriaus(ų) straipsniai
-
Dainora Pociūtė-Abukevičienė,
Ernesta Juknytė,
Vilniaus universiteto Lietuvių literatūros katedra 2012 metais
,
Literatūra: T 54 Nr. 1 (2012): Lithuanian Literature
-
Giedrius Viliûnas,
Pratarmė
,
Literatūra: T 48 Nr. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature
-
Павел Лавринец,
ОККАЗИОНАЛЬНАЯ ПОЭЗИЯ: ПОСЛАНИЕ В ТЕКСТАХ КУЛЬТУРЫ
,
Literatūra: T 55 Nr. 2 (2013): Russian Literature
-
Jolanta Gelumbeckaitė,
Wolfenbüttelio postilė (1573) kaip seniausia lietuviška Antikos, Viduramžių ir Renesanso autorių antologija
,
Literatūra: T 51 Nr. 3 (2009): the Classics
-
Birutė Meržvinskaitė,
Autoriaus alegorijos dekonstrukcijoje
,
Literatūra: T 48 Nr. 4 (2006): World Literatures
-
Rita Tūtlytė,
„Socialistinio humanizmo“ literatūra: užuojauta kaip ideologinės manipuliacijos atmaina
,
Literatūra: T 59 Nr. 1 (2017): Literature
-
Natalia Kovtun,
Образ трикстера в романе Владимира Маканина «Андеграунд, или Герой нашего времени»*
,
Literatūra: T 63 Nr. 2 (2021): Rusistica Vilnensis
-
Алексей Тимашков,
Интермедиальные стратегии авторов «футуристической оперы» «Победа над солнцем» (А.Е. Крученых, М.В. Матюшин, К.С. Малевич, В.В. Хлебников, 1913)
,
Literatūra: T 54 Nr. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Daiva Aliūkaitė,
Vilniaus universiteto Kauno humanitarinio fakulteto Lietuvių filologijos katedros literatūrologų veikla 2012 metais
,
Literatūra: T 54 Nr. 1 (2012): Lithuanian Literature
-
Галина Михайлова,
«…Мое поколенье мало меду вкусило»
,
Literatūra: T 48 Nr. 2 (2006): Russian Literature