Santrauka
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Skaitomiausi šio autoriaus(ų) straipsniai
-
Павел Лавринец,
Международный конгресс «Многоязычие культуры», посвященный 90-летию Ю.М. Л отмана (Тарту, 28 февраля–2 марта 2012 г.)
,
Literatūra: T 54 Nr. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Галина Михайлова,
Александра Самойленко,
ХУДОЖЕСТВЕННАЯ КАРТИНА МИРА В РОМАНЕ ЛЕНЫ ЭЛТАНГ «КАМЕННЫЕ КЛЕНЫ»
,
Literatūra: T 55 Nr. 2 (2013): Russian Literature
-
Ясмина Войводич,
Хронотоп vs. гетеротопия (на примере повести Метель Владимира Сорокина)
,
Literatūra: T 57 Nr. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Dovilė Švilpienė,
Ezoterizmo transformacijos šiuolaikinėje kultūroje
,
Literatūra: T 52 Nr. 1 (2010): Lithuanian Literature
-
Павел Лавринец,
Четвертые Лотмановские дни в Таллиннском университете (Таллинн, 8–10 июня 2012 г.)
,
Literatūra: T 54 Nr. 2 (2012): Russian Literature
-
Dainora Pociūtė,
Carmen Caro Caro Dugo,
Pirmasis jėzuitas Vilniuje: Alfonso Salmeróno laiškai Ignacui Loyolai
,
Literatūra: T 50 Nr. 1 (2008): Lithuanian Literature
-
Галина Михайлова,
Ахматова в поле русской литературы 1940–1960-х гг.: прагматика и семантика стихотворных посвящений М. А. и Е. C. Булгаковым
,
Literatūra: T 59 Nr. 2 (2017): Russian Literature
-
Павел Лавринец,
Книга о литвинах, поляках, русских и Петербурге
,
Literatūra: T 53 Nr. 2 (2011): Russian Literature
-
Павел Лавринец,
Трехтомный свод фольклора старообрядцев Литвы
,
Literatūra: T 52 Nr. 2 (2010): Russian Literature
-
Маргарита Варлашина,
Apie Motiejaus Miškinio straipsnį „Realistas metafizikas“
,
Literatūra: T 58 Nr. 2 (2016): Russian Literature