Santrauka
In the Institutio Oratoria of Quintilian we find a presentation of a theory of the virtues of eloquence: purity of language (latinitas), clarity (perspicuitas), appropriateness (aptum) and ornament (ornatus). All of them were originated by earlier Greek philosophers Aristotle and Theophrastus. Later this theory was taken on and elaborated by Roman rhetoricians – Cicero and Quintilian. Aristotle in his Rhetoric explicitly identified three of the four virtues (clarity, appropriateness and correctness). Theophrastus created a theory of four virtues of eloquence (correctness, clarity, appropriateness and ornament). His system was adopted by most of others. Dionysius, however, developed the most complex system of virtues. He presented a theory of virtues, which were divided into necessary (purity of language, appropriateness, lucidity and brevity) and accessory ones. The accessory virtues were further subdivided into another three groups. Rhetorica ad Herennium offered a three fold system: elegantia (including both correctness and clarity), compositio (similar to appropriateness) and diginitas (similar to ornament). Basically, in almost all aspects being closer to Cicero (who continues the tradition of Theophrastus), Quintilian is more focused on his theory of eloquence. He discusses the virtues of eloquence very widely and deeply, step by step, drawing a number of examples and including the educational process of an orator. Above all, although the theory of four virtues of Quintilian has been influenced by Ciceron, to some extent in general it does not claim originality and plays a paramount role in modern rhetorics, stylistic and pedagogy.
Skaitomiausi šio autoriaus(ų) straipsniai
-
Антон Нестеров,
Географические карты раннего Нового времени как эстетизация и концептуализация репрезентированного пространства
,
Literatūra: T 57 Nr. 5 (2015): Special Issue
-
Domininkas Burba,
Panelės M** Kr*** dabar ponios Sk... pasivaikščiojimas arba Vilniaus apylinkės / Прогулка дѣвицы М** Кр.*** нынѣ гжи Ск...или окрестности города Вильна
,
Literatūra: T 60 Nr. 2 (2018): Russian Literature
-
Vytautas Bikulčius,
Atminties pavidalai Patricko Modiano romane „Prabėgusios jaunystės kavinėje“
,
Literatūra: T 59 Nr. 4 (2017): World Literatures
-
Dalia Jakaitė,
Literatūros mokslas ir teologija: dialogiško santykio realijos ir krikščioniškos mistinės tradicijos laukas
,
Literatūra: T 53 Nr. 1 (2011): Lithuanian Literature
-
Skirmantė Šarkauskienė,
Motiejaus Kazimiero Sarbievijaus Akmens pašventinimas (Sacra Lithothesis): žanro problema
,
Literatūra: T 46 Nr. 3 (2004): the Classics
-
Velimir Mladenović,
Paul Éluard : un épisode yougoslave
,
Literatūra: T 62 Nr. 4 (2020): Literatūra
-
Šarūnas Šavėla,
Filosofinio muzikos įprasminimo aprėptis klasikinio laikotarpio graikų tekstuose
,
Literatūra: T 62 Nr. 3 (2020): Antikos kultūros ir jos recepcijos tyrimai
-
Alexander Markov,
Рубенс в русской поэзии: от экфрасиса к идеологии и обратно
,
Literatūra: T 61 Nr. 2 (2019): Russian Literature
-
Anniken Telnes Telnes Iversen,
Towards a polythetic Definition of the Bildungsroman: The Example of Paul Auster’s Moon Palace
,
Literatūra: T 49 Nr. 5 (2007): Special Issue
-
Giedrė Šmitienė,
Savas miestas: asmens savasties aspektas. Utena Alfonso Nykos-Niliūno kūryboje
,
Literatūra: T 48 Nr. 1 (2006): Lithuanian Literature